Our Experience
4 Sep 2025
Client BH
This £150,000 dispute arose after the Employer, BHDL, failed to issue a valid Payment Certificate or Pay Less Notice in respect of Interim Payment Application 23 under a JCT Design and Build 2016 Contract. Our client, the contractor, commenced a “smash and grab” adjudication under the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996 (as amended) and secured payment through the statutory regime.
Read more
6 May 2025
Client FD
This case involved a high-value dispute exceeding £857,000 between our client, a fire-stopping subcontractor, and the primary contractor, XYZ, following a fraudulent invoicing scheme orchestrated by two XYZ employees. Although our client did not retain any of the fraudulent funds and acted under duress, XYZ sought full reimbursement of approximately £124,000 in inflated invoices and withheld £550,000 in legitimate payments for completed works—later attempting to reopen all historic billing. The matter required complex financial disclosure and forensic analysis to establish our client’s lack of enrichment and entitlement to outstanding sums. After extensive negotiations, a confidential settlement was reached, with our client recovering £220,000 in instalments, avoiding costly litigation and reputational damage.
Read more
20 Jan 2025
Client AM
At IMD Corporate acted for a UK distributor, a deal valued at over £8million. We pride ourselves on facilitating complex transactions that support the strategic growth of our clients. This case not only highlights our expertise in cross-jurisdictional acquisitions but also underscores the importance of meticulous planning, commercial awareness, and the ability to navigate complex legal frameworks.
Read more
9 Jan 2025
CLIENT OC
The £416k construction dispute was resolved in record time without going to court. IMD Corporate acted for a client who purchased an office building intending to convert it into a residential HMO. They entered into a contract with a builder for the necessary works. However, instead of a detailed construction contract typical of such projects, the parties relied on a brief two-page agreement. This lack of clarity in the contract ultimately led to significant differences in the interpretation of the work’s scope, pricing, and valuation methods.
Read more
18 Aug 2024
CLIENT ST
IMD Corporate acted for a company valued at around £10 million and recently closed an early funding round open to outside investors. This examination falls into the legal complexities encountered by existing shareholders, including the founders, as they navigated the investment, the issuance of equity shares, and the structural changes that were necessary to protect their interests and the company’s future.
Read more
